We Were forced To Create The HIV Virus As A Secret Weapon To Wipe Out The African Race – Dr. Robert Gallo

A site run by a friendly and reasonably honest woman I know recently
reposted a text titled “The Man Who Created AIDS: Robert Gallo.” The
text went super-viral, over 80,000 shares on Facebook alone. Once I read
it, I was aghast at how much misinformation and how many scientifically
illiterate statements were in the text and attached video. I wrote her
explaining my reasoning, and she immediately agreed to take down the
text. It still exists on other, less responsible, sites.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Unfortunately, a large part of the damage has already been done, and
that among other articles has helped foster the continued existence of a
completely unfounded theory based primarily on not understanding what a
patent is in molecular biology.

A patent on Ebola or HIV is not the same as a patent on an engine.
Whereas the engine’s patent is reserving the production of that type of
engine to the patent holder, a patent on HIV or Ebola is a patent meant
to specify how the virus was isolated, how the genotype was determined,
and what this consensus genotype is. In biology, you can patent things
you found to concretely identify that component, potentially for use in a
more complex system later. Keep in mind that you can even patent seeds
obtained from cross-pollination: the patent does not mean the species
was genetically modified in a laboratory.

The same way a patent on cross-bred species does not mean it was created
in a lab, a patent on a virus genome does NOT mean it was created in a
lab. Robert Gallo first published his isolation and identification of
HIV in 1984, and patented this in 1985. After older blood samples were
then analyzed in a search for this virus, it was then found in the past:
it didn’t suddenly occur in the 1970s or 1980s.

Despite the claims of the article whose damage I am working to undo, the
earliest samples of HIV positive blood did not originate from New York
homosexuals from the 1970s, but instead date back to 1920s Congo. The
virus most certainly did not originate from biological weapons programs,
which are only today becoming advanced enough that creating such a
virus is even theoretically possible. They were most certainly not
advanced enough in 1920, or even 1960, to create a synthetic retrovirus,
which I might add, has still never actually been accomplished.

One of the articles I saw blaming Gallo comically claims that chimps
were supposedly deliberately infected and released in 1979, which
somehow led to the virus occurring in New York in 1971. The viral “Gallo
did it” article that I convinced my friend to take down had an embedded
video, where a man “explains” over dramatic music that HIV was created
through “combining lymphoma, leukemia, and carcinoma viruses.” I
literally burst out laughing, because none of what he listed was a
retrovirus or even a virus, and cancer has literally nothing to do with
HIV. You could spend your entire life combining lymphomas, carcinomas,
and leukemia, and you would still never end up with a retrovirus at the

All of these theories make very specific claims, without any evidence.
They encourage me to believe that a man (who thinks cancers are viruses)
has special knowledge and access to untold classified documents. To
prove his point, the video displays extremely blurry documents that are
barely legible beyond seeing Gallo’s name. For all we know, these
documents are completely fake, or actually completely harmless. We don’t
know, because as is the norm in such articles or videos: no sources are

 Yes, the United States did and maybe still does have biological weapons
programs. The Soviets did, and Russia still runs its “Vector”
high-security lab, as well. This is absolutely no indication that HIV is
a bio weapon, especially considering the actual time-line of
infections. There are even more reasons why Ebola is certainly not a
bioweapon, but that is beyond the scope of this text. Gallo was a
scientist, and a researcher, and his position in the public eye is yet
another reason to doubt him being an evil mastermind.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

There is no historical evidence actually implicating Gallo, or any others, in creating a HIV virus.All
of the historical and scientific evidence, as well as a general
understanding of patents in science, point to a legitimate researcher,
along with his peers, simply trying to identify understand a human
illness. There may very well be one or more synthetic doomsday viruses
sitting snugly or being worked on in undisclosed locations (or in BSL-4
labs), but HIV and Ebola are not examples of this.

Like it? Share with your friends!

Mr. Francis

Hello I'm Francis, CEO Of Wegossipgh Inc. I believe in writing to cure the broken hearts, Oh yeah.. i know how it feels to be down. Stay in touch daily for all the best of Gossips

Comments 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may also like

More From: Uncategorized


WhatsApp chat